![]() ![]() Updated Novemat 6:57 am: Sibelius 2020.6 and later is is officially supported on Big Sur on Intel replaced Avid news item with compatibility chart. Updated Novemat 4:37 pm: Dorico 3.5.10 is officially supported on Big Sur on Intel replaced Steinberg news item with compatibility chart. Updated Novemat 11:48 am: Updated statement from Musescore. Updated Novemat 7:30 am to consolidate Steinberg statement with news article new statement from Musescore. Updated Novemat 3:28 pm to consolidate MakeMusic statement with KB article. If you’re using any of these products, please share your experience in the comments section. Suffice it to say, like with any bleeding-edge technology, it’s possible you may see some teething pains if you rush out and purchase a new M1-powered MacBook - especially if you rely on any audio plug-ins, or, in some cases, any audio in your work with music notation software.īelow, we’ll share what we know about the Big Sur OS, the M1-based Macs, and the software Sibelius, Finale, Dorico, MuseScore, and Notion. Because the current VST 2 engine in use will not be updated for native M1 support, those hosts will need to develop VST 3 versions in order to natively support M1 as well. ![]() (When an application is released with both native Intel and Apple Silicon support, it will be packaged as a “Universal 2 Binary”.)įinale does not rely on Qt, but, like Sibelius it does use the VST audio engine developed by Plogue Art et Technologie. For instance, it does not appear that Qt, the cross-platform application framework upon which Sibelius, Dorico, and Musescore are dependent, will be updated to natively support M1 until later in 2021, which means these products will likely be running under Rosetta on M1-powered Macs for a good while to come. However, complex software like music notation programs, engineered to run on Intel hardware, are built using a number of integrated components, not all of which may natively support M1 out of the gate. Thankfully, Apple has created a translation layer invisible to the user, called Rosetta 2, that will allow existing Intel apps to run on M1 - much as it did with the original Rosetta, which was created to facilitate the transition from PowerPC to Intel Macs. The common architecture will make it easier for developers to create applications that run across the entire Apple product line - including the possibility of being able to run iOS apps natively on a Mac. The new M1 chips, its first in the new Apple Silicon family, share similarities with the A-series chips you’ll find already find in iPhones and iPads, further cementing the link between Macs and iOS devices.Īpple has said that its new M1 chips, based on Arm architecture, will enable its machines to be more powerful while running more efficiently. For the first time since the transition from PowerPC processors to Intel chips more than a decade ago, Apple is introducing different processors in its new MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro, and Mac Mini, with the remainder of the Mac line expected to follow over the next two years. ![]() We don’t expect users already working on macOS Catalina to be negatively or positively affected by Big Sur when working with these applications - and whenever a new OS is involved, status quo is very welcome news indeed. Big Sur is the first Mac operating system with version number 11 (Catalina was 10.15).Īs we’ve come to expect, Big Sur showcases a number of design enhancements and blurs the line even further between a Mac and iOS, when it comes to the OS’s appearance and core Apple features like Messages, widgets and the Control Center.Īs far as Sibelius, Finale, Dorico, MuseScore, and Notion, are concerned: Broadly speaking, Big Sur does not appear to affect these applications much one way or the other. After months of waiting, macOS Big Sur is set to be released on November 12, 2020. ![]() Subscribe: Amazon | Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Pandora | PocketCasts | Podchaser | RSS | Spotify | Stitcher | TuneIn Download file | Play in new window | Duration: 23:03 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |